CFOtech UK - Technology news for CFOs & financial decision-makers
United Kingdom
EU digital withdrawal rule adds pressure on returns

EU digital withdrawal rule adds pressure on returns

Tue, 2nd Jun 2026 (Today)
Karen Joy Bacudo
KAREN JOY BACUDO Finance Editor

Online retailers selling to consumers in the European Union will have to add a digital withdrawal function to their purchase flows under new EU rules, a requirement expected to increase pressure on returns operations in cross-border eCommerce.

Once enforcement begins, retailers must make contract withdrawal as simple as making a purchase, with a clearly visible digital option built into the online buying journey. The measure is set out in Directive (EU) 2023/2673 and applies to businesses selling online to EU consumers, including UK and other non-EU merchants trading into the bloc.

The change is framed as a consumer rights measure, but it also creates a broader operational challenge for retailers and logistics operators. A digital cancellation request can quickly become a returns, warehousing and refund issue, especially for merchants with fragmented systems across several countries.

Many online sellers still process returns through manual customer service checks, separate national workflows and warehouse systems that do not connect cleanly with refund processes. Those weaknesses become more apparent in cross-border trade, where sellers must also manage customs procedures, transit times and product checks before inventory can be resold.

"In many companies, returns were never designed as scalable operational infrastructure. They evolved market by market, often manually. The new rules are exposing those weaknesses very quickly," said Paweł Zakielarz, Founder and CEO of Shopreturns.

Fashion and lifestyle retailers are expected to be among the most exposed because they already face comparatively high return rates. For those businesses, an increase in digitally initiated withdrawals could add pressure to reverse logistics, inventory recovery and refund administration across several EU markets at once.

The financial impact can be significant when the full cost of returns is included. Reverse logistics, handling and delayed resale can erode margins on goods that appear profitable at the point of sale.

"In one fashion eCommerce case we analysed, margins fell from 20% to 15.5% once reverse logistics and return handling costs were fully included," Zakielarz said.

For UK and other non-EU brands, the picture is more complicated because returns into Europe may involve customs formalities on the way back as well as at the point of entry. In lower-value categories, some marketplaces already issue refunds without requiring the product to be returned when the cost of international processing exceeds the item's value.

Marketplace pressure

Large platforms have already been pushing sellers towards stricter returns standards. Marketplaces including Amazon and Zalando increasingly expect local return addresses, faster refunds, tracking visibility and quicker operational handling in European markets.

Retailers therefore face several layers of pressure at once. Consumer expectations, marketplace rules and legal requirements are converging on the same issue: whether a merchant can manage returns locally and quickly across multiple countries.

"The market is clearly moving towards more localised and integrated return operations. Retailers increasingly need local return points, shorter verification cycles and faster refund handling across multiple European markets simultaneously," Zakielarz said.

Enforcement focus

National enforcement may not be uniform, adding another layer of complexity for cross-border sellers. Germany is seen as an important reference point because courts there have already examined whether digital cancellation functions are genuinely visible and easy to use, rather than merely present but hard to find.

In the Netherlands, courts have referred questions on online order-button wording and consumer flows to the Court of Justice of the European Union. That could influence how strictly digital withdrawal duties are interpreted across the bloc and increase compliance risk for businesses that use different customer journeys in different countries.

As a result, some retailers are moving away from a market-by-market compliance model and designing returns processes to meet the highest common standard across Europe. That approach can reduce the need for country-specific exceptions, but it often requires investment in local returns points, automated registration and closer integration between eCommerce systems, warehouses and refund tools.

"Retailers operating across Europe can no longer think market by market only. The operational and compliance layer increasingly needs to work consistently across multiple countries, languages and return systems at the same time," Zakielarz said.

Operational redesign

Retailers are now reviewing how they manage returned stock, process refunds and route goods back into saleable inventory. The focus is shifting towards local return infrastructure, automated workflows, consolidated processing and shorter recovery cycles for returned products.

For many businesses, this is no longer just a matter of improving the customer journey. It is becoming part of margin control in cross-border eCommerce, where delayed verification and long transport routes can leave stock idle and cash tied up for extended periods.

"This allows retailers to reduce operational fragmentation, simplify returns across multiple European markets and respond faster to both marketplace requirements and customer expectations," Zakielarz said.